Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 320 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium Gold G6405 - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $88.2 vs $120.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10320 - $0.72 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 58 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13577 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
123
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |