Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 13% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-4930K - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $89.95 vs $120.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i3-10320 - $0.48 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
189
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |