Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10110U outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10110U is 2732 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 176 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 6 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |