Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4350 - 264 vs 237 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $51.6 vs $59.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Lost Ark than Celeron G6900 - $0.22 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12944 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |