Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2586 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $19.25 vs $179.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.1 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G540 - 199 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 24 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
11%
Price, $
$179
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |