Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $19.25 vs $179.99
- Up to 89% better value when playing Control than Core i5-11600K - $0.1 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Celeron G540 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
11%
Price, $
$179.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |