Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2683 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $19.25 vs $218.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-9700KF - $0.08 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G540 - 283 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
254
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13726 minutes ago
Buy for $218 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13727 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |