Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $19.25 vs $217.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G540 - 592 vs 437 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 20 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76675 minutes ago
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
23.627684964200476%
Multi-Core
679
8.058390695466414%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |