Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $19.25 vs $143.7
- Up to 84% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-10600K - $0.09 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 15% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G540 - 256 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
222
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2606 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
16%
Price, $
$143.7
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2607 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |