Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2419 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $19.25 vs $85.76
- Up to 75% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.17 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G540 - 127 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
115
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |