Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 855 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $39.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-5820K - $0.16 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3930T - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |