Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $39.0 vs $405.59
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.27 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930T - 165 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
10%
Price, $
$405.59
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $405.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |