Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $39.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-13900F - $0.34 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 70% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3930T - 196 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |