Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 1710 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $39.0 vs $335.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i5-3550 - $0.21 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G3930T - 188 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
186
98.93617021276596%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60966 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
11.797752808988763%
Price, $
$335
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |