Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 205 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $39.0 vs $394.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.3 vs $2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930T - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for $394 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |