Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7920X is 45 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 241 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $326.0 vs $335.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 1200 - $1.35 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
236
97.9253112033195%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
95.07042253521128%
Price, $
$335
97%
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3860 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$326
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $326 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
72.14076246334311%
Multi-Core
2834
31.13601406284333%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |