Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 388 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 771 vs 761 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $197.65 vs $560.04
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-7920X - $0.26 vs $0.73 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
771
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
35%
Price, $
$560.04
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $560.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
761
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |