Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7920X - 142 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $210.0 vs $557.04
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7920X - $1.48 vs $4.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12373 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12372 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |