Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $210.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900F - $0.83 vs $1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - 260 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5773 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |