Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7900X - 657 vs 560 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $210.0 vs $412.83
- Up to 57% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7900X - $0.32 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5626 minutes ago
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |