Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1292 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-7940X - 164 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $210.0 vs $397.83
- Up to 49% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-7940X - $1.28 vs $2.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 28 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5502 minutes ago
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |