Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 433 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $335.0 vs $398.88
- Up to 13% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $3.45 vs $3.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 3 1200 - 101 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 24 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
97
96.03960396039604%
Value, $/FPS
$3.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$335
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2103 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.95/FPS
87.34177215189874%
Price, $
$398.88
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
77.2370486656201%
Multi-Core
2834
38.01985511134961%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |