Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $398.88 vs $419.95
- Up to 42% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900F - $1.04 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 233 vs 216 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
216
92.7038626609442%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$398.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
57.777777777777786%
Price, $
$419.95
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
46.666666666666664%
Multi-Core
7454
43.2893896277368%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |