Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-11600K - 299 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $179.99 vs $435.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-13900F - $0.63 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10915 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |