Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $179.99 vs $529.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-14900F - $0.78 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Core i5-11600K - 272 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
40%
Price, $
$529.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |