Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Core i9-7920X - 287 vs 265 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $179.99 vs $557.04
- Up to 70% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-7920X - $0.63 vs $2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5641 minutes ago
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |