Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-7900X - 193 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $175.0 vs $325.0
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 20 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74301 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |