Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3319 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 154% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-3820 - 145 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $179.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 78% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-3820 - $1.24 vs $5.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3388 minutes ago
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |