Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i7-7700 - 289 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $140.0 vs $429.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $429.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1389
50.879120879120876%
Multi-Core
4460
25.901620303153493%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |