Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7700 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7700 is 250 days older than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - 174 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $167.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - $0.96 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |