Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $197.65 vs $432.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-12900F - $1.63 vs $3.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 132 vs 121 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
121
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.28/FPS
49%
Price, $
$432.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |