Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Core i5-9400 - 162 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $160.91 vs $432.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-12900F - $1.07 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
40%
Price, $
$432.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12354 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
151
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |