Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $39.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-7920X - $0.19 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3930T - 238 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7920X Tray Processor (CD8067303753300)- OEM Pack
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
