Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1281 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $39.0 vs $349.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.19 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3930T - 247 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
13%
Price, $
$349.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |