Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $39.0 vs $275.98
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900 - $0.18 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3930T - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16272 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
14%
Price, $
$275.98
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |