Buy on Amazon
$19.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 855 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $19.98 vs $549.95
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3930T - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T 2.7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $19.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-5930K Processor 3.5GHz 0GT/s 15MB LGA 2011-v3 CPU Only, BX80648I75930K
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
47.40484429065744%
Multi-Core
948
17.2992700729927%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
