Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 217 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $39.0 vs $499.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6950X - $0.35 vs $4.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930T - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |