Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $39.0 vs $549.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900KS - $0.3 vs $3.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 35 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930T - 139 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for $549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |