Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $49.0 vs $78.02
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 39% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1620 - 97 vs 70 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
40.21632251720747%
Multi-Core
723
25.766215253029223%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
