Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 155 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 12% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron B820 - 92 vs 82 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |