Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1647 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 24% better in Dota 2 than Celeron B820 - 198 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |