Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 114 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Celeron B820 - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 6 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |