Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 343 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron B820 - 320 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
320
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |