Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2698 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Celeron B820 - 729 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
