Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702HQ outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702HQ is 330 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4702HQ - 35 vs 37 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than Celeron B820 - 106 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i7-4702HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
