Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1824 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Celeron B820 - 173 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 64 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
