Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2472 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron B820 - 492 vs 424 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron B820 - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
