Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 750 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Celeron B820 - 219 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |