Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 539 days older than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B820 - 168 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |