Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1450 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron B820 - 197 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1416
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,416 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |